What does it mean to welcome Omar Khadr? University students and the lesson of hospitality
Tyler J. Pollard interviews David L. Clark
“Dissociated Consciousness[es]”: The Rising Voice of the Administrator and the Falling Voice of the Academic in the Winter 2015 Labour Disruption at the University of Toronto
Tyler J. Pollard interviews David L. Clark
Earlier this year, professor and public intellectual, Dr. David L. Clark, invited the President and Vice-Chancellor of McMaster University, Dr. Patrick Deane, to support offering Canadian citizen Omar Khadr a spot in the university’s first-year class. And he invited his fellow professors to join him in teaching Mr. Khadr remedial classes, should the young man be willing and able to attend McMaster. Dr. Clark’s initiative came directly on the heels of Mr. Khadr being granted bail from the Canadian prison to which he had been transferred after more than a decade of brutal incarceration in Guantanamo Bay at the hands of the now largely discredited U.S. Military Commission. Importantly, Dr. Clark’s challenge sparked a much-needed conversation about the responsibilities that public universities have to young people whose lives have been undone by Canada’s intensifying culture of fear and militarization. Expanding on his initial gesture of peace, Dr. Clark has now deepened his commitment to Mr. Khadr, young people, and the cultivation of what he describes in our previous interview as “a more just, democratic, and humane public sphere” by starting The Hospitality Project: Five Hundred Letters of Welcome to Omar Khadr:
As a way of affirming the irrepressible solidarities joining youth to youth, I am inviting undergraduate and graduate students at McMaster University and other Canadian public universities to write letters of encouragement to Mr. Omar Khadr—five hundred in all. These letters can be brief or long and about any topic, but written in the spirit of hospitality and in the name of peaceableness and humane reconciliation. It’s up to students to decide: a friendly greeting; a wish for good health and prosperity; an expression of solidarity; a reflection upon war; a desire for peace; a longing for understanding; an entreaty; a salut; an apology. As my colleague and friend, Dr. Susan Searls Giroux asks, “Can the university stand for peace?” My hope is that students will avidly take up this challenge, demonstrating by example the importance of fostering shared understandings rather than shared fears. Letters should be addressed to Mr. Khadr, care of email@example.com. Your return address will be removed. The letters will be posted for all to consider. When we reach five hundred letters, I will have them printed and delivered to Mr. Khadr.
In the following interview, Dr. Clark discusses the social and conceptual contexts informing The Hospitality Project. Crucially, he considers how the project might encourage young people to think and act not with fear but with hope – a timely impetus, to be sure, given the degree to which “terror” has largely characterized the popular public and political discourse about Khadr. At the precise moment that Justice June Ross of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench has lifted many of Khadr’s bail restrictions (one of which forced him to speak English with his family and to do so only in the presence of a chaperone – a most inhospitable constraint), Dr. Clark calls for students at McMaster and other Canadian public universities to stand for peace and justice in a time of seemingly permanent war.
by PETAR JANDRIC and HENRY A. GIROUX An important and broad ranging interview with Henry A. Giroux that addresses critical pedagogy in and for the age of the digital media. Topic of discussion include “haunted digital borders and alternative public … Continue reading
by Henry A. Giroux I have often thought about when that moment came in which my working class sensibility turned into a form of critical class consciousness. For most of my youth, I was defined by ruling-class types and mainstream institutions … Continue reading
Anna Waltman, Natasha Raheja and Shannon Ikebe argue that graduate students perform work that it essential for contemporary university operations and, moreover, that “graduate unionization is not a passing fad, but a movement over half-a-century old.” They provide criticism of a recent New York Times piece which fails to consider graduate student voices when addressing this issue.
John Stauber argues that “the self-labeled Progressive Movement that has arisen over the past decade is primarily one big propaganda campaign serving the political interests of the the Democratic Party’s richest one-percent who created it.” Progressives, he suggests, need to look outside of the established authority in order to rethink a politics not beholden to the ruling financial elite
Susanne Soederberg argues that central to the student loan crisis in the US is the rise of “debtfarism,” which points to a new highly financialized “set of institutional and ideological practices aimed at regulating and normalizing the growing dependence on expensive consumer credit to meet basic needs, such as education”
Stanley Aronowitz argues that the US’s current two party monopoly on politics is hopeless, and thus that “in the present situation, our best hope lies in disruptive social movements that operate outside the two-party system. When oppositional movements gain sufficient strength and are able to break into the public consciousness, the conventional wisdom about what is possible can begin to shift and open up the space for changes in policy”
John D. Whyte, Professor Emeritus, Political and International Studies and Policy Fellow, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School, University of Regina, discusses the decline of Canadian universities’ commitment to the humanities and social sciences and why a robust liberal arts education is vital for a healthy society.
In this Truthout news analysis, Yves Smith discusses “The Art of the Gouge,” a document recently published by a group of 400 faculty members at NYU. The document describes how NYU engages in a “range of tricks and traps to extract as much in fees as possible from students, while at the same time failing to invest in and often degrading the educational ‘product’”